Rate my public speaking. Upload a talk to score clarity, pace, articulation, and engagement with AI speaker feedback.
Select the AI model for audio analysis. Different models may have different capabilities.
Record audio directly from your microphone
Speaker Analysis is an AI-powered tool that evaluates speaker characteristics and presentation skills in any audio recording. It analyzes speaking style, clarity, pace, articulation, tone, engagement level, and overall effectiveness to provide comprehensive feedback on public speaking and presentation abilities. Unlike basic speech recognition tools, this analyzer focuses on communication effectiveness, examining how well speakers convey their message, engage their audience, and deliver content clearly and persuasively. The tool assesses speaking style including formality, energy level, and personal connection, evaluates clarity of pronunciation and articulation, measures speaking pace and rhythm, analyzes tone and vocal variety, examines engagement techniques and audience connection, and evaluates overall presentation effectiveness. It provides specific feedback on strengths and areas for improvement, making it valuable for public speakers refining their skills, professionals improving workplace presentations, students developing presentation abilities, or anyone wanting to become a more effective communicator.
Upload your speaking audio and the AI analyzes all aspects of presentation delivery systematically. Speaking style analysis evaluates formality level, energy and enthusiasm, personal connection with audience, and overall approach. Clarity assessment examines pronunciation accuracy, articulation clarity, word choice, and how easily listeners can understand. Pace evaluation measures speaking rate, rhythm patterns, use of pauses, and whether pace enhances or detracts from clarity. Articulation analysis looks at consonant clarity, vowel formation, and overall speech precision. Tone assessment evaluates vocal variety, pitch range, expressiveness, and how tone supports the message. Engagement analysis examines techniques used to connect with audience, maintain interest, and create involvement. Overall effectiveness evaluation considers how all elements work together to create an effective presentation. The tool provides detailed feedback with specific examples from your recording, noting strengths like 'excellent use of pauses for emphasis' or 'clear articulation throughout,' and areas for improvement like 'pace is too fast in technical sections' or 'could benefit from more vocal variety.' It offers actionable suggestions for improvement in each area.
Yes. Upload a talk, presentation, or practice run and the AI scores the delivery dimensions that decide whether audiences stay with you: clarity, pace, articulation, tone and vocal variety, engagement, and overall effectiveness. Feedback points at specific moments in your recording, so you know which sections dragged and which landed.
The mechanics a speaking coach tracks: whether your pace helps or hurts comprehension, how cleanly you articulate, whether your tone varies enough to hold attention, how you use pauses, and how engaging the overall delivery is. Each dimension gets its own feedback plus concrete suggestions, not a single merged grade.
Either works; a real talk with an audience present is the truer sample because nerves change delivery. Two to five minutes of continuous speaking is plenty for the patterns to show. Recordings where your voice is clear and close to the mic get sharper feedback than echoey room recordings from the back of a hall.
Scope. The filler word detector counts and maps one habit in detail. This analyzer evaluates the whole delivery: style, clarity, pace, articulation, tone, and engagement together, with fillers as just one input. Run this for the overall read, then the filler tool if ums turn out to be your main issue.
It hears delivery, not the room. Audience reactions, eye contact, slides, and body language are invisible to it, so a speaker who relies on stage presence may underscore, and engagement gets judged from vocal evidence alone. Treat it as a precise read on the audio dimension of your speaking, which is most of what remote audiences get anyway.
Yes, and it's the highest-value workflow. Record a practice run, fix the top one or two issues the feedback flags, then record again and compare. Because the analysis names specific behaviors (pace in technical sections, flat tone in transitions), you can verify that the exact thing you practiced actually changed.
Mix quality checker. Upload your track and AI evaluates balance, stereo imaging, dynamics, and clarity.
Lyric meaning analyzer. Upload a song and AI transcribes the lyrics, then breaks down themes, symbolism, and…
Rap flow analyzer. Upload your verse and AI scores flow, rhyme density, cadence, and delivery.
Voice acting analyzer. Upload a read or performance and AI rates character work, range, and delivery.
Guitar skill assessor. Upload a recording and AI evaluates technique, timing, tone, and musicality.
Piano skill assessor. Upload a recording and AI evaluates touch, timing, voicing, and expression.