Rate my UI design. Upload a screenshot for AI scoring of layout, visual hierarchy, usability, and accessibility with UX improvement tips.
Choose the type of analysis you want to perform on your image.
Select the AI vision model for analysis.
PNG, JPG or GIF files supported. You can upload multiple images.
UI/UX Analysis is an AI-powered tool that evaluates interface screenshots for layout effectiveness, visual hierarchy, usability, accessibility compliance, and user experience improvements. The tool examines digital interfaces including websites, mobile apps, software applications, and web applications to assess how well they serve users. UI/UX analysis requires understanding both visual design principles and user experience best practices - how layouts guide users, how visual hierarchy communicates importance, how usability affects task completion, and how accessibility ensures inclusion. This tool combines knowledge of interface design, user experience principles, accessibility standards, usability heuristics, and visual design to provide comprehensive interface evaluation. It evaluates elements including layout structure, visual hierarchy, navigation patterns, interactive elements, accessibility features, and overall user experience flow. The analysis helps designers, developers, and product managers understand how interfaces work for users and identify specific improvements that enhance usability and accessibility.
Upload a screenshot of an interface and the AI examines multiple aspects including layout effectiveness (analyzing how elements are organized, spacing, alignment, and overall structure), visual hierarchy (evaluating how size, color, contrast, and positioning guide attention and communicate importance), usability (assessing how easily users can complete tasks, find information, and navigate the interface), accessibility compliance (checking contrast ratios, text readability, color accessibility, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility), interactive elements (evaluating buttons, links, forms, and other interactive components for clarity and usability), and user experience flow (analyzing how users move through the interface and complete tasks). The analysis provides scores for each aspect (0-10) and an overall UI/UX score (0-100), identifies specific usability issues, suggests accessibility improvements, and offers actionable recommendations for enhancing the user experience. Each recommendation is specific and actionable, helping you understand not just what needs improvement, but how to improve it.
Upload a screenshot and you get a structured review: layout effectiveness, visual hierarchy, usability, and accessibility, each scored 0-10 and rolled into a 0-100 overall. Findings are tied to specific elements (this button competes with that heading) rather than generic principles, so the fixes are actionable immediately.
The things a heuristic evaluation covers: whether the layout groups related elements, whether size and contrast direct attention to the right actions, whether navigation and tasks are findable, and whether contrast and text sizes clear accessibility bars. It reads the interface like a first-time user with a design vocabulary.
Yes: web pages, mobile apps, dashboards, landing pages, email templates, even Figma exports before any code exists. Reviewing competitors' interfaces works too and is a quick way to articulate why theirs feels better or worse. Full-resolution screenshots of complete screens give the most reliable reading.
Anything that requires interaction: flows across screens, animation, loading states, touch target behavior, what happens after the click. A static review evaluates one frozen state, so a beautiful screenshot can hide a broken flow. Use it for layout and hierarchy passes, and pair it with real usability testing for behavior.
No, it is the cheap pass you run before spending user-testing budget. The AI catches convention violations and hierarchy problems in seconds; users catch the surprises no checklist predicts. Teams use this to fix the obvious issues first, so testing sessions surface the interesting problems instead of the embarrassing ones.
Yes, the accessibility component scores contrast, text readability, and color reliance as they appear in the screenshot. It is a visual-layer check, not a full WCAG audit (keyboard order and screen reader behavior need live code), but it reliably catches low-contrast text and color-only signaling, the two most common failures.
Are my chakras balanced? Upload a photo for an AI energy field reading of all seven chakras, blockages, and b…
Is this image AI-generated? Upload any photo for AI to detect telltale signs of AI generation with a confiden…
Rate my photography. Upload a photo for an AI critique of exposure, composition, lighting, and storytelling w…
Critique my artwork. Upload a piece for AI analysis of formal elements, composition, technique, concept, and…
Where was this photo taken? Upload an image and AI identifies likely country, region, and city from terrain,…
How attractive am I? Upload your photo for an AI attractiveness score based on facial symmetry, features, and…